Economy

Supreme Court affirms seafarer disability ruling













WIKIMEDIA/PATRICKROQUE01

THE Supreme Court has affirmed a Court of Appeals ruling that found a seafarer to be entitled to permanent disability benefits after he suffered a hand and shoulder injury while on duty.

In a resolution dated Jan. 23 and made public on Aug. 10, the tribunal concurred with the appellate court’s decision to uphold the findings of company-designated physicians, who had concluded that Dennis R. Villamor’s carpal-tunnel syndrome and rotator cuff tendinopathy entitled him disability benefits.

It said the doctors’ findings were deemed final after the seafarer had been unable to work following the 120-day period required under law.

Under the Labor Code, a disability is total and permanent if the employee is unable to perform any “gainful” occupation for a continuous period exceeding 120 days.

Only doctors chosen by employers may determine if a worker has sustained a permanent disability while on duty.

The seafarer’s employers, Transocean Shipmanagement (Philippines), Inc. and Companhia Portuguesa de Navagacao International SA., had offered to pay $9,000 for the shoulder injury, arguing that his hand injury was not work related, citing the opinion of third-party doctor.

Mr. Villamor’s hand injury had been diagnosed as a Grade 10 disability, which under Philippine Overseas Employment Administration’s rules entitles the worker to $10,075 in compensation.

The shoulder on the other hand was classified as a Grade 11 injury, making the seafarer eligible for $7,465 in compensation, subject to the legal interest rate of 6%.

“The opinions of the company-designated and the independent physicians are rendered irrelevant because the seafarer is already conclusively presumed to be suffering from a permanent and total disability” the tribunal said.

“It must be consistently reiterated that the law governing the entitlement of a seafarer to disability benefits consists of an interplay between the Labor Code (and) the Amended Rules on Employee Compensation,” the court said. — John Victor D. Ordoñez

Neil Banzuelo




Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Most Popular

Your daily news source covering investing ideas, market stocks, business, retirement tips from Wall St. to Silicon Valley.

Disclaimer:

TheProficientInvestor.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively "The Company") do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice.
The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

Copyright © 2021 TheProficientInvestor. All Rights Reserved.

To Top