Notice: Trying to get property 'display_name' of non-object in /home/theproficientinv/public_html/wp-content/plugins/wordpress-seo/src/presenters/meta-author-presenter.php on line 40

Supply snarls promise Southeast Asia bigger slice of trade pie

TRADE DISRUPTIONS from China’s lockdowns and the war in Ukraine are seen doing for Southeast Asia what the US’ spat with Beijing couldn’t meaningfully do — redistribute supply chains.

“Much of the discussion around dependency on China has been linked to the US-China rivalry,” according to a report by Hinrich Foundation. But the latest “disruptions have broadened the number of countries currently assessing the risks to their supplies.”

This time around, Japan and European Union (EU) members are looking to secure supply linkages without increasing cost, wrote Stewart Paterson, the report’s author and research fellow at the Asia-based foundation set up by US entrepreneur Merle Hinrich to promote sustainable global trade.

The EU and Japan each account for about 12% of total direct investment flows into Southeast Asia for the past five years, compared with China’s 8% share, according to the report. With a per capita gross domestic product (GDP) of $4,500, the 10-member bloc of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) is also a “far less costly source of labor than China,” Mr. Paterson wrote.

Another reason that sets apart the US-led efforts earlier to reduce dependence on China from what’s happening now is the relation between the state and the companies, he said. Unlike in the US where multinational corporations are “notoriously independent” from government-set agendas, the linkages run much deeper in the EU and Japan.

“The passing of Japan’s new Economic Security Law and the EU’s Global Gateway policy are the most recent manifestations of close government-corporate cooperation in industrial policy,” Mr. Paterson said.

Here are some more key points from the report:

ASEAN’s export performance between 2016 and 2020 has more or less matched that of China. The bloc’s exports grew by 21% to $1.39 trillion during the period, while China’s grew by 23% to $2.59 trillion.

The ASEAN bloc has been enmeshed in the global trading system and has trade-to-GDP ratios well above the global average.

Currently, much of the growth in ASEAN trade has been with China itself. The bloc’s exports to China grew by 51% between in the four years to 2020, while exports to the rest of the world grew by 16%. — Bloomberg

Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Most Popular

Your daily news source covering investing ideas, market stocks, business, retirement tips from Wall St. to Silicon Valley.

Disclaimer:, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively "The Company") do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice.
The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

Copyright © 2021 TheProficientInvestor. All Rights Reserved.

To Top